 |
Introduction
Infectious Disease at the Millennium
By Thomas J. Pallasch, DDS
Copyright 1999 Journal of the California Dental Association.
As we approach the year 2000, one would have to be totally impervious to the lay media
not
to realize that serious problems confront us emanating from the microbial world. Some may
view these developments with great alarm and fear that the final days are upon us. Indeed
this issue might be construed by some as alarmist. Yet, the underlying theme of this issue is
that forewarned is forearmed and that dentistry -- as a prominent member of the health care
professions -- must face these issues; place them in perspective; attend to these problems
where appropriate; and, above all, end any semblance of denial that such problems are real.
As an educator, I have come to realize that reality is not easily accepted and that many
will
deny as long as possible. Also, I find that many individuals do not have a firm grasp of the
history of infectious disease. Prior to the advent of immunization, personal and civic
hygiene, and antimicrobial agents, life was commonly brutish and short. Typhus, typhoid,
diphtheria, whooping cough, smallpox, cholera, bubonic plague and yellow fever routinely
devastated entire populations. Staphylococci and streptococci were the scourge of hospitals
(as they are again today). The constant fear of our parents was the "dreaded disease of
summer": poliomyelitis. Yet, today most of these infections have been eliminated from first
world populations. How truly fortunate we are.
Yet as Murphy aptly cautions: "Optimism indicates that the situation is not clearly
understood." So to place our current infectious disease situation in perspective in the limited
space allotted, I prevailed upon three acknowledged experts in infectious disease to present
their ideas on emerging diseases, hepatitis in its multiple forms, and microbial resistance to
antibiotics particularly with reference to the oral cavity. Their efforts are followed by
discussions on questions arising from the 1997 American Heart Association Prevention of
Bacterial Endocarditis Guidelines, an update on patients who have taken
fenfluramine/dexfenfluramine, and finally a review of the current status of antibiotic-associated
Clostridium difficile colitis.
Having spent many hours talking with Dr. Jack Beierle on the topic of emerging and
re-emerging infectious disease, I asked him to put this in writing as a general overview of the
topic with special emphasis on what is and what can be done to manage these problems. This
he has done admirably and, to those who might say this is not pertinent to dentistry, I must
caution that infectious disease does not begin nor end at the dental office door.
I have known Dr. Michael Glick for many years and am most impressed with his
knowledge
of infectious disease and his expertise in treating medically complicated dental patients. He
has provided us with a most expert and comprehensive discussion of hepatitis and its many
etiologic agents, including the new TT virus. Surely hepatitis must be a major concern for us
all.
After listening to a program by Dr. John Molinari on dental office infection control and
being totally enthralled for hours, I asked him to present a general review of microbial
resistance to antibiotics and was delighted with his suggestion that this be tailored to the oral
cavity. He has done well on a topic (resistance of oral microbes to antimicrobial agents) that
has received very little study due to limited finances and few investigators. We face an age
of abundant use of chemicals to treat relatively innocuous diseases, and Dr. Molinari warns
us of our past and present misguided use of antimicrobial agents.
Since the 1997 publication of the American Heart Association guidelines for the
prevention
of bacterial endocarditis, several members of the committee have answered questions
regarding these recommendations put to us by dental practitioners and hygienists. Drs.
Kathryn Taubert and Tommy Gage have assisted in putting our best advice answers to the
questions on the printed page. These answers are not "official" from the AHA and are not
intended to supplant the dentist's best clinical judgment in a given situation but seem
reasonable and prudent to three who were present at the conception, gestation, and delivery
of the AHA guidelines.
The discussion of the current status of the cardiac valvulopathy associated with
fenfluramine
and/or dexfenfluramine includes a review of all the published studies up to December 1998
(the deadline for submission to the Journal for these papers) and a discussion of the now
operant three recommendations for the management of these patients. Also included is a
discussion of the primary pulmonary hypertension caused by these agents, which is a greater
short-term risk than the potential lifetime risk for endocarditis due to the valvulopathy. The
table included in this paper should be very useful in a discussion with physicians who may
not be aware of these recommendations.
Finally, the effort on antibiotic-induced Clostridium difficile colitis is the only
update on this
topic for dentistry since 1981, and it brings us a bit of good news. It appears that colitis in
general and the dreaded pseudomembranous colitis associated with the community use of
antibiotics is quite rare. This will be important if the widespread resistance of viridans
streptococci to the penicillins seen today in hospitals spreads to the community as is likely.
Clindamycin may return as the drug of choice in orofacial infections, particularly if such
resistant streptococci become a community hazard. The downside is that Clostridium difficile
is now a major pathogen in hospitals.
This issue of the Journal is intended as a strong dose of reality. It is not intended
to frighten
but to educate and motivate. It should put us beyond the learning curve of medicine on these
topics. Hopefully, that is where we want to be.
Contributing Editor
Thomas J. Pallasch, DDS, MS, is a professor of pharmacology and periodontics at the
University of Southern California School of Dentistry.
|