 |
Periapical Diseases
Periapical Diseases: Spectrum and Differentiating Features
Joseph A. Regezi, DDS, MS
Copyright 1999 Journal of the California Dental Association.
 |
There are a variety of lesions besides the typical granulomas and cysts that can appear at the
apices of teeth. These other lesions must receive consideration in the diagnosis of periapical
disease because of their potential impact on patient treatment and outcome. This paper will
review the spectrum of diseases that may present in periapical tissues, the pathogenesis of
periapical inflammatory disease, and the signs and symptoms that separate periapical
inflammatory disease from neoplastic disease.
|
In addition to the commonly encountered periapical granulomas and cysts of the
jaws, there are many other lesions that may appear at the apices of teeth. These other lesions,
which range from nonodontogenic cysts to malignancies, must receive due consideration in the
diagnosis of periapical disease because of their potential impact on patient treatment and
outcome. In distinguishing between periapical inflammatory disease and periapical neoplastic
disease, a definitive diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic parameters can never be
absolute because of the many overlapping signs and symptoms. This makes differential diagnosis
for a periapical lesion as important as it is for any other lesion of bone or soft tissue. Unless the
clinician is thinking in broad rather than narrow terms, serious conditions may go undiagnosed
and untreated for an inappropriate period of time.
The purpose of this paper is to review:
* The spectrum of diseases that may present in periapical tissues;
* The pathogenesis of periapical inflammatory disease; and
* The signs and symptoms that may be useful in separating periapical inflammatory disease from
neoplastic disease.
Diseases That Appear as Periapical Radiolucencies
Inflammatory tooth-associated diseases, non-odontogenic cysts, dysplastic bone disease, benign
neoplasms, and malignancies can all appear as radiolucencies at the apices of teeth (Figures
1 through 4). In Table 1, periapical diseases are classified according to biologic
behavior. This is not an exhaustive list, but it is representative of the more commonly reported
diseases found in periapical tissues of the jaws.1-5 Only 10 percent of periapical lesions turn out
to be something other than a granuloma or cyst.
|
Table 1.
Periapical Diseases Classified According to Biologic
Behavior1-5 |
|
Inflammatory
Periapical Granuloma and/or scar
Periapical cyst
Periapical Abscess
Actinomycosis |
|
Benign
Traumatic bone cyst
Nasopalatine duct cyst (incisive canal cyst)
Langerhans cell disease
Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor*
Periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia*
Ossifying/cementifying fibroma*
Vascular malformation |
|
Benign Aggressive
Odontogenic Keratocyst
Central giant cell granuloma
Myxoma
Ameloblastoma
Calcifying odontogenic cyst*
Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor* |
|
Malignant
Metastatic disease
Lymphoma/leukemia
Multiple myeloma
Other
*may also present with mixed lucent-opaque pattern |
Pathogenesis of Periapical Inflammatory Disease
All periapical inflammatory conditions have a common etiology and represent variations of the
inflammation-repair theme. All are associated with nonvital teeth whose necrotic pulps stimulate
an inflammatory response in the periodontal ligament and bone at the tooth apex. Chemical
mediators of inflammation (cytokines and chemokines) released from the dead and dying tissue
affect the recruitment of white blood cells into the area. Here they phagocytose necrotic tissue
and release additional mediators to sustain the inflammatory response and initiate the repair
process. Specific diagnosis is dependent upon the stage of the inflammatory process, i.e., whether
the process is acute, chronic, or chronic with acute exacerbation. Once the inflammatory stimulus
is removed (through tooth extraction or endodontic filling), the repair process continues,
ultimately resulting in healing with regenerated bone in the area.

Figure 1. A periapical cyst showing radiographic continuity with the periodontal ligament space. The biopsy specimen (right) shows nonspecific hyperplastic epithelium supported by inflamed connective tissue. A cyst lumen is evident, top left. |

Figure 2. A lateral jaw radiogram showing lucency at apices of vital canine and premolar teeth. The biopsy specimen (right) is a classic odontogenic keratocyst. |

Figure 3. A periapical radiolucency at the apex of a mandibular canine with equivocal vitality. The biopsy specimen (right) shows fibroblasts and multinucleated giant cells, which are characteristic of central giant cell granuloma. |

Figure 4. Periapical radiolucencies associated with mandibular incisors. Note that the lucency extends coronally along lateral periodontal ligament spaces and that the lamina dura is ill-defined. The biopsy (right), which shows atypical cells making tumor bone, was diagnosed as osteosarcoma. |

Figure 5. The microscopic appearance of a biopsy of a periapical lucency associated with a nonvital tooth shows a colony of actinomycosis. A gram stain (right) of tissue section shows characteristic gram-positive filamentous structures at the colony periphery. |

Figure 6. A persistent periapical radiolucency that upon biopsy (right) proved to be a calcifying odontogenic cyst. Note the typical keratinization (light globules) and calcification (dar globules) in the epithelial lining (courtesty of Dr. Timothy A. Wong, Sacramento, Calif.). |

Figure 7. A persistent periapical radiolucency that upon biopsy (right) was found to be a nasopalatine duct cyst. Lobules of anterior palatal salivary gland can be seen to the left of the cystic lesion. |

Figure 8. A persistent periapical radiolucency that was diagnosed as periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia after biopsy (right). |

Figure 9. Poorly defined persistent periapical radiolucencies associate with apices of maillary incisors. The biopsy (right) was diagnosed as lymphoma. |
|
A periapical abscess is an acute phenomenon characterized by rapid focal fluid exudation and
neutrophil emigration from resident vessels, resulting in pus formation and intense pain. A
periapical or dental granuloma represents a focus of granulation tissue and inflammatory cells
that have replaced apical bone. Periapical granuloma is not the same as granulomatous
inflammation, which is defined as a type of chronic inflammation that features a predominance
of macrophages (e.g., tuberculosis, sarcoidosis). A periapical granuloma may develop from
low-grade sustained chronic inflammation or from an abscess left untreated. Variable amounts of
scarring are seen in periapical granulomas, and they represent advanced repair. Occasionally,
when there is cortical perforation by the inflammatory process, osteogenesis may not occur, and
the lesion remains as a fibrous scar even in the presence of an adequate root canal filling. Also, if
there is open communication between the tooth apex and oral cavity (e.g., through a carious
lesion), the microaerophilic bacterium actinomyces, found in the oral flora, can colonize in the
inflamed periapical tissues (Figure 5). This variation of periapical granuloma can result
in an actinomycotic infection of the jaw. Diagnosis of these various inflammatory conditions is
usually obvious microscopically; but because chronic abscess, periapical granuloma, and
periapical scar share many microscopic features, separation can be somewhat subjective.
A periapical cyst can be defined simply as a pathologic space lined by epithelium at the apex of a
nonvital tooth. The epithelium, derived from the ubiquitous epithelial rests of Malassez in the
apical periodontal ligament, proliferates due to inflammatory stimulation in a pre-existing
periapical granuloma. The epithelial proliferation can be regarded as a defense mechanism that
protects surrounding bone from the irritants of the necrotic dental pulp. Microscopic examination
of this dynamic process shows a variable picture ranging from partial to complete epithelization
of the periapex. Again, diagnosis is subjective and dependent upon when in this process the
lesion is biopsied and how the pathologist defines periapical cyst. The subjectivity associated
with microscopic diagnosis in all likelihood accounts for the wide range of periapical cyst
incidences (10 percent to 50 percent) reported in the literature.6
It is generally agreed that once a periapical granuloma becomes well-epithelialized, complete
bony healing is unlikely with root canal therapy alone. Whether a partially epithelialized
periapical granuloma can heal following root canal therapy is still unknown, although it is likely
that some can. Probably most of the endodontically treated teeth in which the periapical lesions
persist (approximately 10 percent to 20 percent of cases) will be related to cystic change of a
periapical granuloma. Also, persistent lesions may be associated with incompletely filled canals
and/or apical foreign material.7 Although large lesions are more likely to be
cysts, there is no way to distinguish radiographically a periapical granuloma from a periapical
cyst.
A small but important number of persistent periapical lucencies will be noninflammatory
(Figures 6 through 9). These lesions, which range from dysplastic to malignant, should
be considered whenever a periapical radiolucency is unusual or refractory to endodontic therapy.
The benign aggressive and malignant lesions are of particular importance because of their
prognostic implications. Delayed diagnosis of one of these lesions could have profound
consequences for the patient. Occasionally, signs and symptoms can give some early signals that
the lesion in question is not inflammatory. It should be remembered that these other lesions not
only can mimic chronic inflammatory periapical disease, but also can occur concomitantly with
an inflammatory lesion. The reader is referred to a current oral pathology text for the
clinical-pathologic details of these other lesions.8
In the vast majority of cases, it is neither practical nor desirable before performing root canal
therapy to biopsy all periapical lesions to eliminate the risk of overlooking a malignancy or a
benign aggressive condition. While a biopsy ensures the certainty of a diagnosis, it is invasive
and may have some associated morbidity. When there are no inexplicable signs or symptoms
associated with the lesion in question, it is most likely a periapical granuloma or cyst. This
rationale would support endodontic therapy without microscopic diagnosis. If, however, a
presenting sign or symptom suggests that malignancy or benign aggressive disease should be
included in the differential diagnosis, a tissue biopsy would be well-advised. Also, if after
"conservative" endodontic therapy, the lesion does not heal as expected or the patient continues
to have symptoms, then a biopsy of the periapical region is warranted.
Following are the signs and symptoms that suggest the possibility of noninflammatory periapical
disease:
* Paresthesia or atypical pain;
* A lesion that appears to have no radiographic relationship to the apical periodontal ligament
and lamina dura;
* Large lesions and lesions with ill-defined margins; and
* A lesion-associated tooth that is intact and of positive or equivocal vitality.
If paresthesia is present, malignancy should be given serious consideration and placed at the top
of the differential listing. Approximately half of the patients presenting with a numb lip have an
intrabony malignancy. Because acute inflammation can also cause paresthesia, abscess should be
placed high in the differential diagnosis. In the absence of paresthesia and in the presence of a
long history of intermittent low-grade pain, an inflammatory process would receive top
consideration. If the associated tooth also tests nonvital, the lesion is most likely a periapical
granuloma/cyst/chronic abscess.
Focal widening of the periodontal ligament space and relative thinning of the lamina dura may be
helpful in separating inflammatory lesions from others. The spatial relationship of "true"
periapical inflammatory disease to tooth apex may be different than with other nondental lesions.
Superimposition of a neoplasm on the tooth apex (so-called false periapical lucencies) can
sometimes be detected by changing the radiograph angulation, thereby causing a shift of the
pathologic image.
Generally, the larger the lesion, the greater the likelihood that it is a periapical cyst rather than a
granuloma.9 Other cysts and neoplasms will likewise be more likely. Because
age and location are highly characteristic of many of the noninflammatory lesions, these two
factors will have considerable influence on the differential ranking of these lesions.
Slow-growing lesions such as periapical granulomas and cysts will typically be well-defined and
surrounded by reactive sclerotic bone. These signs are not often associated with faster growing
benign aggressive and malignant lesions.
If the tooth in question is deemed nonvital after pulp testing with one or, preferably, two vitality
tests, inflammatory periapical disease should be strongly favored. The well-known vagaries of
vitality testing and the occasional association of neoplasms with nonvitality deem it necessary,
however, to be inclusive in building a differential diagnosis.10 Further, a patient
could have two lesions: a neoplasm superimposed upon a periapical granuloma/cyst.
When reviewing the health history of a patient with a periapical lesion, any previous treatment
for a jaw tumor would be significant, as recurrence could potentially appear near the apices of
teeth. Also, a history of a previously treated malignancy of another organ, including lymphoma
and multiple myeloma, would be important.11 Of particular importance would be
a history of breast, lung, gastrointestinal, thyroid, or kidney cancer, as these commonly
metastasize to the jaws, especially the mandible.12 It should be remembered that
with adenocarcinoma of the breast, metastatic disease may occur as late as 10 to 15 years after
treatment of the primary lesion. Paresthesia and pain are typically associated with jaw
metastases.
Summary
The diseases that may present as periapical radiolucencies have been listed and some examples
have been illustrated. Signs and symptoms that should be considered when evaluating a
periapical lesion have also been discussed. The following points were emphasized:
* Neoplasms, while infrequently encountered, can clinically and radiographically mimic
periapical granulomas and cysts.
* Atypical lesions (especially those associated with paresthesia) and large periapical lesions
should be biopsied.
* If, following endodontic therapy, there is no relief of symptoms and/or the periapical lesion
does not resolve, a biopsy should be considered.
* Definitive microscopic diagnosis should be made for all excised periapical lesions.
Author
Joseph A. Regezi, DDS, MS, is a professor of oral pathology in the Division of Oral Medicine,
Pathology, and Radiology at the University of California at San Francisco School of
Dentistry.
References
1. Curran AE, Miller EJ, Murrah VA, Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor presenting as periapical
disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 84:557-60, 1997.
2. Heng CK, Heng J, Implications of malignant lymphoma on a periapical mandibular lesion.
Gen Dent 43:454-8, 1995.
3. Mohammadi H, Said-Al-Naief NAH, Heffez LB, Arteriovenous malformation of the
mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 84:286-9, 1997.
4. Nohl FSA, Gulabivala K, Odontogenic keratocyst as periradicular radiolucency in the anterior
mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 81:103-9, 1996.
5. Su L, Weathers DR, Waldron CA, Distinguishing features of focal cemento-osseous dysplasia
and cemento-ossifying fibromas. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
84:540-9, 1997.
6. Ramachandran PN, Pajarola G, Schroeder HE, Types and incidence of human periapical
lesions obtained with extracted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
81:93-102, 1996.
7. Talacko AA, Radden BG, Oral pulse granuloma: clinical and histopathologic features. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:343-6, 1988.
8. Regezi JA, Sciubba JJ, Oral Pathology: Clinical-Pathologic Correlations, 3rd ed.
Saunders and Co, Philadelphia, 1999.
9. Natkin E, Oswald RJ, Carnes LI, The relationship of lesion size to diagnosis, incidence, and
treatment of periapical cysts and granulomas. Oral Surg 57:82-94, 1984.
10. Garlock JA, Pringle GA, Hicks ML, The odontogenic keratocyst: a potential endodontic
misdiagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85:452-6, 1998.
11. Dhanrajani PJ, Abdulkarim SA, Multiple myeloma presenting as a periapical lesion in the
mandible. Indian J Dent Res 8:58-61, 1997.
12. Carroll MKO, Krolls SO, Mosca NG, Metastatic carcinoma to the mandible. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 76:368-74, 1993.
To request a printed copy of this article, please contact: Joseph A. Regezi, DDS, MS, 513
Parnassus, S-512, San Francisco, CA 94143-0424
|