 |
Letting Go
Jack F. Conley, DDS
Copyright 2000 Journal of the California Dental Association
From the perspective of many longtime members of organized dentistry,
its tripartite membership structure has always been the glue that holds
dental professionals together. However, in the past decade, the market
share and percentage of the active profession that holds continuous membership
has declined. Dentistry is unique among professional organizations in
that the tripartite has helped organized dentistry to build unified support
from a majority of professional colleagues. However, in view of changing
demographics in recent years, there has been increasing concern that membership
may continue to decline unless new answers can be found to make organized
dentistry more relevant and more attractive.
Traditionally, the local, state, and national associations that form the
tripartite have provided what have been considered to be the needs and
wants of the membership via the democratic process. That process utilizes
the collective decision-making of committees, boards, and Houses of Delegates.
One of the problems we have seen with this process is that leadership
and staff energies are directed in a proactive manner to develop needed
programs or policies or to defend against a new challenge from outside.
They are left with little time to analyze, modify, or eliminate existing
policies and services that might have outlived their usefulness. With
changing times and demographics, the types of needs and wants that once
fulfilled the expectations of most members may no longer dominate the
wish list of the current membership. If out-of-date programs remain in
place without modification or removal, they contribute unnecessarily to
the cost of association operation. Combined with the cost of new programs
approved by members, they add to a high total dues bill that either discourages
renewals or is unattractive to nonmembers.
However, for members and nonmembers alike, we see some positive changes
on the horizon that should make membership more relevant to the average
dentist. Change will start with leadership. Evidence of the changes that
can be expected from the California Dental Association depend to a significant
degree on the changes in new leadership detailed in this space several
months ago. Recently, the year 2000 Executive Committee and the senior
staff of CDA held meetings to assess the issues and directions of the
association for the coming year. Similar meetings have been held annually
in recent years. However, this year, the tenor of the discussions and
the conclusions adopted for further discussion by association committees
and decision-making bodies was exciting and far-reaching.
As American Dental Association Editor Lawrence Meskin observed in his
recent JADA editorial on building the ADA membership base, the
thinking has to be "outside the box." The creative thinking on the planning
done by CDA leadership was definitely outside the box. They displayed
a commitment to supporting President Kent Farnsworth's theme of "Foundation
for the Future." Traditional philosophies and policies were not protected
from critical analysis. Changes that would improve the function of the
organization and provide programs or benefits attractive to nonmembers
or wavering members were central to the discussions. Some of the planning
would require significant change in how CDA relates to its membership
at the local level and is not without risk. But, risk-taking is essential
in any effort to improve the relevance and function of an organization.
Perhaps it is because of the realization that we now reside in a new century
that a strong spirit for change is evolving. However, it will depend upon
a leadership and an association staff that have committed themselves to
effecting necessary changes that will lead to a more vital and desirable
membership-driven organization. We believe the commitment to change is
genuine. However, it will take time for boards and individual leaders
at the local and state level to approve the changes that will be at the
heart of continuing discussions in the coming months.
It will also take time for members to accept and adapt to change. One
of the characteristics of individual business owners such as dentists
is that we find it difficult to move away from the comfort of a long-term
policy or philosophy. That is a significant part of our message regarding
organizational change, namely, "letting go." We must be willing to let
go of traditional programs or policies that no longer are beneficial to
the majority. We must be willing to accept and support change that will
enable organized dentistry to become stronger in numbers and to demonstrate
relevance to all segments of the membership.
Successful advocacy in matters of legislation and regulation has been
one of the greatest achievements of organized dentistry. Individual members
often do not understand nor appreciate how much is regularly accomplished
on their behalf by staff and volunteers of their organizations at all
levels. That activity must continue and, in many cases, expand. New programs
and philosophies that are relevant to dentists of every ethnicity and
at every age level must receive fair consideration.
Given such a scenario, it is impossible to adopt new programs and a new
attitude without giving something up. To add new programs with a heavy
price tag will not appeal to long-time members or to new members, particularly
those carrying a heavy educational debt load. Thus, there will be an absolute
necessity to let go of some long-held philosophies and programs if we
are to progress.
It will not be easy. It will take creative thinking and sacrifice at all
levels of leadership and membership for organized dentistry to move forward
successfully. For now, the possibilities have already excited a few. It
is anticipated that the process of change will become exciting to all
segments of the membership as the goals and preliminary plans achieve
support and approval.
|